Mac pro 2007 layout pdf#

Mac pro 2007 layout pdf#

Then, I compared the result to the new feature 'Save as PDF or XPS' from Word 2007. This could be quite confusing for a user, to say the least screen reader. So, in my example file, he announced $2 and $5 as amount 2010 rather than 2009.

It reads the wrong header for the active cell because of the missing. Using the JAWS 'active cell' command (Ctrl-Alt-Numpad 5) to announce the column headings. I found the problem when I was testing a file with the JAWS screenreading software. To automatically mark as cells of table header header lines in the PDF file, I put the first two lines of 'Repeat header lines.'Ĭonversion from Word 2007 with the 'Save as Adobe PDF', or any other method that uses the Acrobat plugin, creates a tree of tag that is missing a tag.

It's actually a very common technique for the presentation of the data in the table. As see you in the Word file, the table is very basic, but one of its column headings is divided into two cells. I just created a simple docx file with a (attached) table, and when I converted it to PDF, I noticed a difference in the tags that it creates from the conversion of Word XP. This seems to be a minor problem, but it is one that could create a lot of frustration for a disabled person using a screen reader to read tabular data in a PDF document.Īs you know, Acrobat plays well with applications Office allowing users to create (structured) tags, accessible PDFs from MS Office files. Apparently a new option has been added to AA X.īug? Tags accessibility conversion from Word 2007 However, you will need to do this 500 times.

Open the PDF 2-top and use the object tool to select a junction of the border and remove. If you use AA9 or earlier, you can get rid of the borders, but for your number of pages, it will be a lot of time. Cropping of course individual pages is out of the question. Something like: CREATE INDEX testFK_SFLABP_SFLABPR_IDXīorderless printing and multiple Pages per sheet (PDF)Īnyway to do it? I have the doc of pdf page thousand I want to print but want to maximize display area. version of DB were is Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.3.0 - ProductionĬreating indexes on columns of the FK. REFERENCES TESTSFLABPR (LABP_REF_IRN) ENABLEġ127) DELETE FROM testSFLABPR WHERE LABP_CONFIG_ID = 1128 I hope I posted all the information that is relevant. If I run the exact scenerio even with only a primary key on the table without locks heldĬONSTRAINT PK_testLABPR_IRN_SL PRIMARY KEY (LABP_REF_IRN)ĬONSTRAINT testFK_SFLABP_SFLABPR FOREIGN KEY (LABP_IRN) Second session now does the following DELETE FROM testSFLABPR WHERE LABP_CONFIG_ID = 1128 second session is now locked until a commit or rollback occurs. REFERENCES TESTSFLABPR (LABP_REF_IRN,LABP_REF_SL) ENABLEĭELETE FROM testSFLABPR WHERE LABP_CONFIG_ID = 1127 I've hardcoded in 1127,1128 number to make it easier (in reality it is a sequence)ĬONSTRAINT PK_testLABPR_IRN_SL PRIMARY KEY (LABP_REF_IRN,LABP_REF_SL)ĬONSTRAINT PK_testSFLABP PRIMARY KEY (LABP_IRN, LABP_OPNO, LABP_NO) ENABLE,ĬONSTRAINT testFK_SFLABP_SFLABPR FOREIGN KEY (LABP_IRN,labp_no) I created two scenerios one that works and is not based on the primary key and foreign key constraints (but one that works is not possible for us because it would mean change design table that we can not do). I was wondering if anyone can shed some light on this? Hi guys I have a problem with a table of locking in Oracle forms, but when I try in SQL happens here too many users. Problem with the locking insert and delete between two linked tables help please.